Psst. Robert Fergusson has a story to tell. The sought-after speaker and Hillsong teaching pastor was once considered such a poor communicator that a school essay was selected as one of the worst-written essays in a century. Thankfully for the rest of us, the talented Fergusson has thick skin and isn’t easily deterred. His new book, Are You Getting This?, is much more than a practical guide to understanding the age-old practice of storytelling. It’s also a roadmap that helps public speakers overcome the fear of standing in front of an audience and making that critical connection.
Far more than simply a primer for preachers and teachers, Are You Getting This? is an effective tool for everyone, from business leaders who want to learn how to communicate effectively with their team; to parents who want to know how and why they should tell stories to their children. Fergusson not only pours a lifetime of experience into this book, he does so in a way that connects with the reader from the jump, offering us a standout read. Fergusson shows us that a story is more than just a story, it’s an instantly recognized vehicle through which we pass on wisdom. He gets that fear is real, and that it takes fire and passion to overcome it. He helps us understand that stories are the perfect way to find common ground, the conduit through which we can reach our audience. Lessons shared from a life spent serving, all of it beautifully told, the perfect read for anyone who seeks to understand what it means to truly communicate.
Spend any time at all with Robert Fergusson, whether that’s listening to one of his sermons or chatting with him about his new book, and you instantly realize that he’s the real deal; someone who genuinely cares and who effortlessly connects, the kind of person who draws you in and takes you along for the ride.
English by birth, Australian by choice and European by taste, Fergusson has been a part of the Hillsong mega-church for more than 30 years, during which time he has seen incredible growth on a global scale. With the COVID pandemic gripping every corner of the world, 2020 has accelerated the use of virtual-meeting technology in ways both captivating and unexpected. Hillsong College, like all other colleges and universities, has had to adapt to the ‘new normal,’ and Fergusson’s lectures are just as engaging online as they are in person. Great stories transcend platforms. Great storytellers transcend time. Robert Fergusson has both bases covered, and a book that can help you achieve the same.
“Wherever you find yourself in life, I believe this book is going to encourage, instruct, and inform you about how you can fulfill your life’s purpose,” says Fergusson. “I hope the lessons I’ve learned along the way can help you on your journey to rediscover a love for learning and teaching, the importance of impartation, and the eternal truths found in the greatest story ever told.”
The title is interesting, because I am a teacher. When I get up to speak, I am so passionate about people getting an idea that I constantly say, “Are you getting this?” And, many years ago a friend said, “If you ever write a book on communication, you should call it, ‘Are You Getting This?’ So, that’s exactly what I’ve done. It’s become my catchphrase. I’m very passionate about communication, and I think that all of us in some form or another are involved in public speaking. My own journey is that I was a terrible public speaker when I was a child. So I’ve had to learn, and I wanted to pass on some of those ideas that have help me along the way. That was my motivation for writing this book.
Fear of speaking in public is almost universal. It can be a traumatic experience.
It can certainly be terrifying, but I’m living proof that it doesn’t have to be. I was brought up in England with no passion or desire to be a teacher or a communicator. When I was in school I was told that I was stupid, lazy, and disappointing. You must understand, I went to the sort of school that didn’t hold back on its school report. In fact, I still have a school report saying that this boy cannot express himself. So, every time that my parents received my report, it was a disappointment, especially in the area of public speaking. Well, I returned to that school after many years and learned that they had put together a centenary magazine, in which my geography essay from 1966 had been published as the worst piece of writing in 100 years of the school’s history [laughs]. Thankfully, they didn’t put my name at the bottom, just my initials!
How did storytelling help you overcome your fear?
The idea of being involved in public speaking was totally alien to me. I was later studying zoology at university when I became a believer in Christ, and it became evident that I was going to end up in some sort of ministry position. Clearly, I had to learn to speak, and storytelling was one of the ways that I overcame some of my nerves. Think about it: When you’re talking about stories – I would often write stories about animals – there is almost always a natural connection with the audience. Because there’s such an emotional connection, stories became my normal way of communicating. It’s really developed from there. I’ve now been a speaker for 46 years, the last 30 of those in Australia, and stories have become more and more central to the way that I communicate.
You call this book your redemptive story.
I love redemptive stories that start with the hero or a heroine who is flawed, or who is maybe going in the wrong direction, or who is going through some process, challenge, or test. Then there’s a turning point or a redemptive moment where they fulfill their goal, and, in a sense, it all ends happily ever after. I know that is a bit of a cliché, but there is something about that arc that is very satisfying. The theme of the book is very much a redemptive story.
There are some lighter moments in the book as well.
In storytelling, they say the difference between a comedy and a tragedy is how the hero or heroine engages with the dark power in the middle of the story. I think that is what all of us have to deal with, regardless of the situation. We have to engage with the challenges that will either turn us into a tragedy or a comedy. I prefer comedies.
When did you start writing the book?
This has been a long journey. People often say, “How long does it take to write a sermon?” When I’m being pedantic, I may say seven hours, but in reality it has taken over 60 years. The book is been a long journey. I’ve been teaching on preaching and communication for the last 30 years in our college here, so there has always been the seed of a book. This one has probably developed over a 10-year period. One goal I had was that I didn’t want to put out a little book on my own, I really wanted the book to serve as one of the church’s resources. Because I wanted the church to be the backer and publisher of the book, in a sense I was happy to wait until what I felt was the right time.
Is there a particular story from the book that you wouldn’t mind sharing?
There’s a chapter in this book called Fire Overcomes Fear. The basic principle is that, if you have a passion that is greater than your fear, then you can overcome that fear. I use the illustration that, if you were a mother and you were terrified of snakes, but you had to step over a snake to get to your child, you would do that without hesitation. Why? Because your love for your child is greater than your fear of snakes.
So, when I’m teaching, I try to find people’s fire. There’s a great verse in the Bible that has been a real help to me. In Jeremiah, 20:9, it reads, “If I say, ‘I will not mention his word or speak anymore in his name,’ his word is in my heart like a fire and I cannot contain it.” I try to encourage people. I look for their anger, I look for their passion. If you can get that, then your background doesn’t matter. Your story doesn’t matter. Your lack of talent doesn’t matter. If you can tap into that, then you can be an effective communicator.
You’ve been with Hillsong Church for about 30 years, so you’ve seen its explosive growth into a mega-church. How did you start out?
It’s an interesting story. Brian Houston, who is the senior pastor of at Hillsong Church, visited England back in the 1980s, and was speaking at the church in which I was a minister. At the end of a group meeting I went up to him and said, “Is anyone looking after you for lunch?” It turns out that he didn’t have plans, so I invited him to join me for lunch. I had absolutely no agenda or expectations. I just simply invited a visiting speaker to lunch. I often say that a simple decision, or an act of hospitality, can completely and utterly change your destiny. This was certainly the case here, because a number of years later his father invited me to Australia. At the time, Hillsong Church was actually two centers, or as you might say, two local churches – one located in the city, and one farther west. Then, in 1999, the two came together and became Hillsong Church. The rest is history. Those two centers became campuses, and, suddenly, there was extraordinary growth and influence. It has been a wild ride. People often come to us from different parts of the world and say, “What’s the secret?” We just say, “It’s through the grace of God,” because there is no secret. For some reason, God decided to use a very simple church in Australia to impact millions of people. It is an extraordinary thing.
Hillsong Church is a church without borders. How has Hillsong managed through the coronavirus pandemic?
You can either see threats as dangers or opportunities. Our pastor, Brian Houston, saw this global pandemic as an opportunity to go online and reach more people. Of course this involved huge challenges – we operate a college and many of our students had to go home, and almost everything that the college offered had to transition to being fully online. Suddenly, people from all over the world are saying, “Well, I don’t have to move to Australia to go to Hillsong College, I can attend it from anywhere.”
There are so many examples. I was talking to our pastor in Sweden recently, and because of the lockdown he has had to make some adjustments to the services offered there. Now they are only allowed to meet in small groups. So, instead of having two or three big services, he has started hosting micro-services all across Sweden. Last weekend he had 67 micro-services, many of which were in towns that he had no contact with before. Technology has given us greater reach, greater influence, and greater opportunity.
Do you consider yourself a born teacher?
That’s a really interesting question. I’ve always loved teaching. My children used to say, “If you ask dad to tell you the time, he would tell you how to make the watch.” There’s something about the desire to pass on information that is deep inside me. I think my mother gave me that. She was immensely curious. People say, “Who is the great heroine in life?” I always say that it’s my mother, in large part because she gave me the gift of curiosity. To be honest, I’ve never seen myself as a great preacher, or a great teacher, or even a great storyteller. I think the fact that I struggled in school has actually helped me to become a better coach. I know what it’s like to not get something – hence, the name of the book, Are You Getting This? I understand the steps that you need to take to get from one place to another. I know how to get the best out of people.
What is your philosophy when it comes to writing?
They say that poetry is the best words in the best order. If you look at someone like Winston Churchill, who was a great orator, you could see that he chose the exact words that would fit that exact situation. When he became Prime Minister during World War II, he could have said, “I’m really committed to working hard. I’m going to do my very best. I’m very committed to the cause.” Instead he said, “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.” As soon as you hear it, you realize that those are the right words in the right order. Nothing wasted. That is my philosophy.
Final Question: If you had one piece of advice for others what would that be?
Well, it’s almost impossible to give one piece of advice apart from the grace of God, which is foundational. But I say to people, keep doing the right thing. I think the right thing is often the wise thing, the good thing, the loving thing. If you keep doing the right thing, then sooner or later you’re going to be given that opportunity. I might not be the best preacher in the world, but here I am, at Hillsong Church. I just kept turning up, and kept doing the right thing.
His arrival in Boston coincided with that of a certain shot-blocking, game-altering, paradigm-shifting center named Bill Russell, his considerable basketball talent overshadowed by the dazzling ball handling of fellow Holy Cross alum Bob Cousy and the dead-eye marksmanship of the gifted Bill Sharman. There would soon be other marquee players added to the mix, future Hall of Famers such as John Havlicek and the Jones Boys, KC and Sam, further obscuring the contributions of one Thomas William Heinsohn, and yet his very arrival helped cement a roster on the rise send the Boston Celtics on an unparalleled, decade-long championship feast.
Despite starting his Celtics career in Russell’s considerable shadow, Heinsohn was the trigger man for that untouchable run of eleven titles in thirteen seasons; with Russell in Melbourne, missing the first 24 games of 1956-57 regular season to compete in the Olympic Games, Heinsohn bounded onto the NBA stage like a playful pup, chasing down rebounds and firing those patented low-trajectory jumpers en route to the league’s Rookie of the Year Award. The capstone of that dream season came in Game 7 of the 1957 NBA Finals. With Cousy and Sharman both ice cold from the field, Heinsohn scored 37 points and grabbed 23 rebounds in Boston’s thrilling 125-123 double-overtime win over Bob Pettit and the St. Louis Hawks. It would prove to be the defining moment for Boston Celtic basketball, and in many ways the foundation of Celtic Pride: That win not only established Boston as a perennial NBA power, but it also stamped the Celtics as clutch performers obsessed with the bottom line, an unselfish team far greater than the sum of its individual parts.
Born on August 26th, 1934, in Jersey City, Heinsohn flourished at St. Michael’s High School, earning all-county and all-state honors as a junior, and then earning national All-America honors as a senior. The four-year letter winner averaged an eye-popping 28 PPG during that 1951-52 season, drawing national attention and prompting an avalanche of scholarship offers. He ultimately decided on Holy Cross, then one of the preeminent basketball programs in the country, following in the collegiate footsteps of another hoops legend, Bob Cousy.
At Holy Cross, Heinsohn went onto become a three-year letter-winner, as well as a three-time All-Conference performer. As a junior he averaged 23.3. PPG, and as a senior he set a school scoring record by averaging 27.4 PPG. The numbers could be downright spectacular – on March 1, 1956, Heinsohn scored a school-record 51 points against Boston College – or they could simply be amazing, such as the eighteen consecutive free throws made in a game against Georgetown University earlier that same season. Not surprisingly, Heinsohn finished his senior season by being honored as a consensus All-American, but perhaps even more impressive was his making the dean’s list (four times in two years) and being named Holy Cross’ top student-athlete.
A territorial pick by Red Auerbach and the Celtics in the 1956 NBA Draft, Heinsohn averaged 16 PPG during his rookie season. Together, Heinsohn and Russell proved to be the missing ingredients to a championship mix, defeating the Hawks in that dramatic 1957 NBA Finals and staking claim as professional basketball’s team of the future.
Heinsohn’s scoring averaging increased during the 1957-58 season, to 17.8 PPG, but an ankle injury to Bill Russell in the ’58 Finals allowed the Hawks to claim the title. Nicknamed “Tommy Gun” and “Ack-Ack” by his teammates, Heinsohn’s offensive punch helped the Celtics win a second title a year later.
The 1959-60 NBA season brought another championship to Boston. Heinsohn’s scoring average increased for the fourth consecutive year, to 21.7 PPG, this to go along with a career-high 10.6 RPG. Battling Wilt Chamberlain and the Philadelphia Warriors in the Eastern Division Finals, Heinsohn was there when the team needed him most, tipping in a shot at the buzzer to win Game 6 and send the Celtics back to the NBA Finals. For Heinsohn, that play remains one of his biggest thrills.
“Wilt didn’t like me to begin with,” Heinsohn recalls with a smile. “He was pretty easy-going, but for some reason I seemed to get under his skin. I scored twenty-two points in that game, including that tap-in at the buzzer. It was a great feeling to score like that.”
Heinsohn was named to his second All-Star Game the following season, and the Celtics were once again world champions. It was a delicious pattern that would repeat for the next four seasons. He would retire following the 1964-65 campaign, his mind willing but his ailing knees unable to carry him further as a professional basketball player. Still, there were no regrets; his nine years in the league had produced eight championships and six All-Star selections.
Auerbach would retire a year following the 1965-66 season, and, in the ultimate show of respect, he approached Heinsohn about taking his place on the bench. Heinsohn didn’t have to think long about the offer – he pretty much refused on the spot.
“I was flattered, but I knew that Russell still had a few years left,” he says. “I couldn’t accept the job because, aside from Red, there was only one other person who could coach and motivate Bill Russell – and that was Bill Russell.”
Auerbach agreed, and Russell was named player-coach. He would win two more championships over the next three seasons and then bow out a winner. The final tally for the Russell Dynasty would be eleven titles in thirteen years, including eight in a row.
Russell would retire following that 1969 title run, and Auerbach once again approached Heinsohn about the head coaching job. This time Heinsohn agreed. With Auerbach providing the talent – he grabbed Kansas point guard Jo Jo White in the 1969 NBA Draft, and a year later selected Florida State’s Dave Cowens – the rebuilding Celtics enjoyed a speedy resurgence; after finishing 34-48 during Heinsohn’s rookie campaign as head coach, the team rebounded with a 44-38 record the following season. A 56-26 record ended a two-year playoff drought, and then the Celtics rolled to a 68-14 record during the 1972-73 regular season. The 68 wins were a team record. Heinsohn was named the NBA Coach of the Year.
The next season would prove magical, as Heinsohn’s Celtics dropped to 56-26 but advanced to the 1974 NBA Finals. Considered an underdog to Lew Alcindor (Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) and the Milwaukee Bucks, the undersized Celtics played a frenetic brand of basketball to forge a 3-2 series lead. In Boston for what would a the penultimate Game 6, Jabbar’s buzzer-beating skyhook forced Game 7 back in Milwaukee. The media proclaimed the new-look Celtics dead, that they had squandered their best chance to claim the title. Privately, Heinsohn had a different take on things. He saw an old Oscar Robertson, his legs weary from a long season and a difficult playoff push, and he knew that his players were fresh and ready to atone for that Game 6 loss. And atone they did: Cowens scored 28 points and grabbed 14 rebounds, outplaying the bigger Jabbar. Jo Jo White and Don Chaney forced Robertson to work hard on both ends of the court. Paul Silas was a beast on the glass. And when it was over, the Celtics were once again world champions – the first of the post-Russell era.
“We were able to dictate the style of play,” Heinsohn says quickly. “We forced them to play our way, and we wore them down over those seven games.”
The Celtics were unable to repeat the next season, but they were able to reclaim the title one year later, following the 1973-74 regular season. It was Boston’s second title in three seasons. That series will forever be remembered for Game 5 in the Boston Garden, a three-overtime thriller against the Phoenix Suns that the league now bills as ‘The Greatest Game Ever Played.’ As a coach, Heinsohn compiled a 416-240 record over eight full seasons, won five consecutive Eastern Division titles, and two world championships. He would resign midway through the 1977-78 regular season, but his passion for the Boston Celtics kept him in the game as a television broadcaster and earned him the reputation as the team’s ultimate homer.
“The Boston Celtics are a special organization, one of the best in all of sports,” he says with a smile. “I’m proud to be a part of the Celtic family.”
Please tell me a little about your childhood, and some of the things that led you to the basketball court.
I grew up during the Depression and World War II. In 1944, my family moved to Union City, New Jersey, and that’s when I first started playing basketball. All sports, for that matter. A guy named Perry Del Purgatorio took an interest in me in the schoolyard – he played at the University of Villanova with Paul Arizin. He was between his sophomore and junior years, and he would come home and practice at night, and one night I just happened to be there. He asked me to shag the balls, and we became friends. And I did that every night, and he taught me how to play basketball. That’s how I started playing basketball, and by the time I got to the eighth grade I was pretty good. I got a scholarship to high school, which allowed me to play basketball at a little Catholic school. So that’s how I started playing. I tried out for the football team, but never made it. I played a little bit of baseball. But basketball was my game.
You played your high school ball at St. Michael’s High School in Union City.
I had a terrific high school coach. His name was Pat Finnegan. He arrived at St. Michael’s just prior to my sophomore year. He was a World War II veteran and a Fordham grad. His brother John was a marine and Seton Hall graduate. Both played college basketball for their schools. The two of them would come around on Saturdays and would scrimmage with all kinds of people, so by the time I was a sophomore in high school I was playing against very, very good basketball players.
How good was your high school team?
By the time we got to be seniors we had a very good team. I played with two guys who ended up going to college on basketball scholarships. We won the Metropolitan Catholic Championship – all of the Catholic schools in and around the New York metropolitan area competed. Teams from New York and New Jersey.
You were a two-time All-State basketball player at St. Michael’s. Did that help open doors to playing against better competition?
I was selected to play in an All-Star game down in Murray, Kentucky, for the Converse Rubber Company. You’d go down there for a week. You’d have two-a-days and scrimmages, and then you would play the game. The coaches spent that entire week evaluating the players, and that’s how I ended up being selected to the high school All-America team. I was also on a team that went up to Eastern States Catholic Invitation Tournament in Newport, Rhode Island, which at that time was a big deal. We played well and ended up in the final game, but we lost that one. It was a great experience that helped me transition to the college level. In fact, I had over 350 offers after making the All-America team, so it opened up a lot of doors.
I hear you also played some semi-pro ball.
I played practically every night, from my sophomore year on. I played under another name for the Jewish Y. I played PIL basketball for a semi-pro team, which was really the best experience I could have gotten. The league was more talented, and more competitive than my high school league at the time, which in itself was pretty good at the time. I played against some pros, and I played against some All-Americans. A lot of college players. In one tournament at the end of my sophomore year, against this kind of competition, I was selected as the MVP of the tournament., which was quite a thing for a kid that age.
Why did you choose to play college ball at Holy Cross?
I selected Holy Cross because I wanted to go to a Jesuit school, and because it had the best basketball program at the time. Holy Cross was number one in New England, and I knew several of the players. Togo Palazzi, who also played for the Celtics and who was two years ahead of me, was a Union City guy. I had played against him in high school, and he was a terrific player. Another guy by the name of Earl Markey – he was a senior when I was a freshman in high school, and he had played in the same league that I had played in. I knew his brother, and I played semi-pro basketball with his brother. So I knew some of the people, I liked the school, and I liked the coach. So I went to Holy Cross.
Freshman weren’t eligible for varsity ball in those days.
I played on the freshman team. We were an undefeated freshman team, and we used to battle the varsity to a standstill in practice.
You ended up having a pretty decent college career at Holy Cross, finishing as the school’s all-time leading scorer and a consensus first-team All-American.
My sophomore year we won the Sugar Bowl, and we won the NIT, which was the premiere tournament at the time. We were ranked number one or two in the country, depending upon which ranking you wanted to use. But we were a terrific team. There were three sophomores starting on the team that won the NIT. The next two years were successful and challenging at the same time. We lost Togo Palazzi to graduation. He was drafted by Red Auerbach and played for the Celtics. We also lost Ronnie Perry, our captain, so we really didn’t have the same team. To make matters worse, my coach had a falling out with the school and left at the end of my junior ear. My senior year brought a brand new coach and a new philosophy and everything else. But I ended up making All-American both years. I played against the Harlem Globetrotters, I played in All-Star games, and I was selected as a territorial pick by the Boston Celtics.
What was the territorial pick all about?
Back then, the territorial process was really the first round of the NBA Draft. You had the exclusive rights to a player if you wanted him, regardless of where you finished in the standings. It was based on a player’s proximity to the team, and it allowed teams to showcase players that were popular in that team’s market. So the Celtics executed their territorial rights on me.
In 1956 you joined a Celtic team on the verge of a dynasty. Did you know fellow Holy Cross alum and Celtics star, Bob Cousy?
Well, I had watched the Celtics play. I really didn’t know Bob Cousy until I joined the Celtics, even though he lived in Worcester, where Holy Cross is located. He was busy playing basketball for the Celtics and I was still in school at the time. So I never really got to meet him. But, as I said, I did get to see Cousy and the Celtics play. They were an up-tempo team.
Tell me about your first year in a Celtics uniform.
That year changed everything for the Celtics. Walter Brown and Red Auerbach made the deal to get Bill Russell, after St. Louis selected him with the third overall pick in the 1956 NBA Draft. The Celtics also got KC Jones in the second round, and they used that territorial pick on me. The Celtics got three Hall of Fame players in the same draft.
Russell went to the Olympics, so he didn’t join us until midyear. In the meantime, I learned to play with Cousy. That turned out to be the best way to adjust to NBA basketball. And the reason we were so successful was because of the rebounding. Prior to my being there, and Russell being there, they really had a terrific offense but no rebounding. “Easy” Ed Macauley played underneath the basket for them – he was the key player that Boston packaged in order to get Russell from the Hawks – and he was too thin to really compete against the big guys inside. He was 6’8”, but he didn’t weigh 200 pounds. He was terrific scorer, though. He just wasn’t a rebounder. Russell and I provided that. Plus, I was a scorer. Russell came in around the middle of the season on. We were eight games out of first place by the time Russell came back from the Olympics and started playing with us.
Bob Cousy and Bill Sharman, who were established pros at the time, were the most experienced players on that 1956-57 team. Jack Nichols was a forward on that team. Arnie Risen was the center until Bill Russell showed up. There was Jim Loscutoff, who had been a rookie the year before. Andy Phillip, who ended up being a Hall of Fame player, was a part of that team. He was a great playmaker, and very steady. So it added up to a pretty savvy basketball team, and as the younger group started to mesh. KC Jones actually didn’t play that year, because he had to go into the service for two years. We later added Sam Jones and Satch Sanders, and the Boston Celtics was well on its way to becoming a dynasty.
After years of playoff disappointment, the Celtics finally broke through.
We played well in the postseason, and we made it to our first NBA Finals. We beat St. Louis in double-overtime of Game 7, which I still consider to be the most thrilling game that I was ever involved in – and I’ve been involved in a lot of Finals series, broadcasting, coaching or playing. To the best of my knowledge, there has never been another seventh game that has gone into double-overtime.
You scored 37 points and grabbed 23 rebounds in that Game 7 victory over the Hawks.
It was a championship game, winner-take-all. I got up for the game, and Russell got up for the game, but Cousy and Sharman were so nervous that they never really performed at their best. Russell had a super game, but I had a super game, too. Frank Ramsey played very well. So did Jim Loscutoff. Cousy and Sharman were like 4-for-40 from the field, or something like that. They really had a tough night scoring. But they played great defense, and they got the ball to other people when they needed to.
What do you remember most abut that game?
I remember Russell fouling out. I remember how intense the game was, and the excitement in the Boston Garden. The two greatest plays that I ever saw in basketball happened in that game – one with Russell, who blocked a shot after going out-of-bounds and running the length of the court. He came out of nowhere to block Jack Coleman’s shot for a layup. It was breathtaking to watch. And then, Alex Hannum throwing the ball the length of the court pass off the backboard and into the hands of Bob Pettit, to get a shot with two seconds left. It was an eighteen footer, and it almost went in. I had never seen anybody ever do anything like that before or after. And now they’ve changed the rules, of course, so you don’t have to do that. But he threw it the length of the court, it hit the right corner of the backboard, and it rebounded all the way out to Bob Pettit [laughs]. He got the ball, and he almost made it.
You were very close to team founder Walter Brown, but your friendship was tested in the days before the 1964 NBA All-Star Game. Tell me about that.
I was the president of the NBA Players Association, and in 1964 the All-Star Game was going to be held in the Boston Garden. A really difficult situation developed between the Player’s Association and the league with regards to playing conditions – there were no trainers at that time, no pension plans, and playing games on Saturday night and then traveling all night to try and play a game on television on Sunday were just some of the problems that we were trying to address. Well, the owners wouldn’t talk to us when they promised that they were going to talk to us, and it all came to a head at the 1964 NBA All-Star Game. I had told Walter Brown that I didn’t know what was going to happen, but unless something was done with regards to these issues, then something was going to transpire at the All-Star Game. I let him know this about a month before the game was to be played. The days passed, and the closer it got to playing the All-Star Game the more it looked as if the players were going to boycott. You have to understand, back then the All-Star Game was the most important national exposure for the league. It was vitally important to both the players and the owners, but especially for the owners because they were trying to grow professional basketball in a big way. Well, minutes before game time, NBA President Walter Kennedy gave his personal guarantee that adoption of a pension plan would occur at the next owners meeting, that coming May. And he was true to his word. The owners approved a plan in which they would contribute 50% toward the purchase of a $2,000 endowment policy. That’s how the NBA pension plan was started.
Did it effect your relationship with Walter Brown?
And after it all happened, Walter Brown called me the biggest heel in sports. He said that if the league had a team in Hawaii he’d send me to the team in Hawaii. He eventually calmed down, and by the end of the season we won the title. At the team’s breakup dinner he stood up, and he said that I was the main reason why the Celtics had won the title that year. Believe it or not, at the same time all of this was going on, I was in the insurance business and I was handling the insurance side of Walter Brown’s estate planning. So I had a somewhat of a mixed relationship with Walter. He was a terrific human being, and a man of his word. Frank Ramsey used to send his contract signed completely blank, and he would have Walter fill in his figures. I can remember negotiating my contract standing in the bathroom at the urinal, and before I zipped up we had a deal [laughs].
Red Auerbach often took the Celtics on preseason barnstorming tours throughout New England. What was it like to ride in the car with Red?
I never rode in the car with Red Auerbach – you’d have to be crazy to ride in the car with Red Auerbach [laughs]. My funniest story? I don’t know if anyone ever told you this one, but it revolved around Jim Loscutoff, who had had back surgery and was trying to make the ball club again. Naturally, after back surgery Loscutoff was a little tentative. Now, Red had been in the Navy, and had done some work helping guys recuperate from injuries in the service, and what have you. Psychologically, he tried to get into Loscutoff’s head. He wanted to make him forget about the back and just play basketball. Anyway, he would have separate drills on these road trips up through New England. We’d go to play in a high school gym, and we’d all go to take a nap in some motel, and in the afternoon he would take Loscutoff to the gym for a separate workout. Loscutoff was my roommate, and he would come back to the motel and go, ‘I’m gonna get that little sucker, and I’m gonna kill him.’ And he kept saying this, you know, and finally I went to Red and said, ‘Red, what are you doing to Loscutoff?’ I said, ‘You better watch out, he wants to kill you.’ And Red said, ‘You and Ramsey, you two come and watch what I’m doing. Just don’t let him know that you’re there.’ So we sneaked into the high school gym and hid way up in the stands behind some seats, and we watched Red put Loscutoff through his paces. And he would throw the ball on the floor, and he would say, ‘Okay, doggie, go get it.’ Loscutoff was expected to dive on the floor and jump on the ball. And then Red would throw these long passes so that Loscutoff had one step and then he would crash into the wall. And after it was all over, I looked at Ramsey and I said, ‘If I were Red, I wouldn’t keep dong that to Loscutoff – he’s a little bit left of center anyway, and he’s just crazy enough to knock Red into next week.’ [Laughs]. But to give Red his due, he got Loscutoff’s head back into the game, and Loscutoff was an important part of the team for years to come.
Your relationship with Red Auerbach is clearly special. How were the two of you able to get along so well?
Before I became the coach, I spent four years in the management end of the insurance business, in which I was very successful. As I was going through the initial management course for the insurance company, all of a sudden I started to see how good Red really was as a manager of people. How he drafted certain players, and why. And how he made the acquisitions to get players in to help keep the team on top. All of the motivations he used, and everything else. And I thoroughly believed in the philosophy that we had about running and making the other team play twice as hard, and think twice as fast. The other thing was, unbeknownst to a lot of people at the time, every time we signed a rookie and something was wrong, he’d ask me questions. For example, he might say, ‘Tommy, what’s wrong with Mel Counts? Why can’t he rebound, and why can’t he hold onto the ball?’ And I might say, ‘Well, he’s not catching the ball off the board. He brings it down and it gets slapped out of his hands easily.’ And Red would respond, ‘Well, you work with him.’ So over the years I worked with a lot of players. As a consequence, Red saw me dealing with a lot of players. Larry Siegfried, for example. Red was going to cut him, and I used to play one-on-one with Siegfried. Nobody could beat me one-on-one until Siegfried showed up. He would beat me every time we played. So I said to Red, ‘Before you cut Siegfried, you should know that he’s the only guy on the team that can beat me one-on-one.’ Red looked at me curiously, and he said, ‘He does? Well, we’re going to have practice at the Garden. You play him one-on-one and let me watch.’ So, Red was way up in the stands where he couldn’t be seen. And he watched – Siegfried never knew this – and so we played and he beat me again. Red kept Siegfried.
After I had retired, he called me up that summer and said that he had a chance to get Don Nelson. He said, ‘What do you think of Don Nelson?’ And I said, ‘Red, Don Nelson is slow as shit. He cannot run. But he and Joe Holup are the only two guys that I played against in the NBA that I couldn’t get around. I don’t know how he does it, but he does it. He’s also a terrific shooter, so if you’ve got a shot at him I think it’s well worth the effort.’ So that was my contribution to Don Nelson landing in Boston. And I think Red saw something in me as a coach, and that’s why he approached me for the job.
Tell me about your friend and the radio voice of the Celtics, the late Johnny Most.
Johnny Most and I were really good friends. I hung around Johnny from my rookie year on, because he was a very intelligent man, and he was a great storyteller. I would ask him questions about everything. He was in second World War, and I would meet all of his buddies. He was a gunner on a B-24. So, we’d go out somewhere and one of his buddies from that crew would meet up with us. I’d go out to dinner with them, or breakfast or lunch, or whatever, so I got to know all of his old-time buddies. Johnny had a tough time in the service. He was in Italy, and he was there with the Tuskegee Airmen, and he was one of the planes that they used to protect. So, he wrote about stuff like that. And it made him ultra-sensitive. He would tell stories about that period in his life.
He helped me after I started broadcasting the games in ’66. So I roomed with Johnny Most on the road when I did the game. We did twenty-five road games. I would room with him, and he helped me learn how to broadcast. After I became the coach of the Celtics, I started broadcasting at Sports Channel, and in the summer we used to have Johnny Most sound alike contests. So I would emcee the sound alike contest all over New England – at the hotel, a bar, whatever. And we had a lot of fun doing that.
Johnny Most was also a Pop Warner football coach, and the commissioner of a Pop Warner football league in his community. And he helped get my son involved in football. So, we were brought together in many different ways. I was friendly with him as a player, I would pal around with him as a coach, and we hung out in between during my time as a broadcaster. So I hung out with Johnny Most for well over twenty years.
He always had a slew of jokes – he’d sit down, and he’d just rattle off these jokes. You’d go out with him after a game, and sit at a bar, and he’d start telling jokes and everybody would be laughing their tails off. What else? He’d been up in the Borscht Belt in New York, which is up in the Catskills. He knew all of the comedians, and everything else. So, Johnny was a special person and a good friend of mine. And it was a shame that, ultimately, even when he knew what was going to happen he never stopped smoking.
Do you have a funny story from your time with Johnny Most?
My favorite story about Johnny Most? If he took a liking to you, then he would try to promote you on the broadcast. At that time my roommate was Lou Tsioropoulos, which was my rookie year. So, he liked Louie. Loscutoff got hurt and couldn’t play in the playoffs, and Louie had to fill in for him. And his broadcast went something like this: “I can’t believe the defensive job Lou Tsioropoulos is doing on Bob Pettit. I mean, he’s in his jersey, he’s in his sneakers, there’s no place that Pettit goes that Lou Tsioropoulos isn’t right there with him. Here we are in the middle of the second quarter and he’s only got….thirty-two points?” I laugh about that to this day.
You scored 22 points in Game 6 of the 1960 Eastern Conference Finals, beating Wilt Chamberlain and the Philadelphia Warriors.
That was one of my more memorable games, because I tipped that shot in at the buzzer. That’s the only time that anybody has ever shut up 11,000 Philadelphians all at once [laughs]. Convention Hall went deathly silent.
You were known to get under Wilt Chamberlain’s skin.
Wilt was a force to be reckoned with, and he took an immediate dislike to me during his rookie year in the league. He ripped off my jersey during one game in which we had a little altercation. We had a little play that we used to help us beat Philadelphia all the time, because Wilt got a little lazy at times. They would shoot a free throw, and make it, and Russell would run down the floor. Cousy would inbound the ball real fast, and Russell would outrun Wilt easily, and Russell would get a layup. So we were getting three or four baskets a game off of that. By the time we get to the series with the Sixers that year, Wilt has caught on. So before the series starts, Red said, ‘The play with Wilt is not working anymore, so we’re going to change it a little bit. We’re going to have somebody step in and block out the shooter once the ball goes through, go pick off Wilt Chamberlain, so Russell can get the step on him and beat him down the floor.’ So that sounded pretty good to me, because I was never the guy blocking out the shooter. I was always on the line, rebounding. So, for five games, I’ve gotta go and get in front of Wilt Chamberlain on every free throw. Finally, he gets wise to what I’m doing. And he says, ‘You do that one more time and I’m going to knock you on your ass.’ So, you know, you never back down. I looked him in the eye and I said, ‘Bring your lunch.’ So, they made the free throw, and I went over there, blocked him…I set a pick on him…and sure enough he knocked me on my ass. I went all the way out to half court. Whereupon he comes running down the floor, winds up, and he’s punching me as I’m getting up to my knee. And I’m looking at this fist coming at me, and all of a sudden Tom Gola walks in between us. And he hits Gola off of the back of the head – and Wilt breaks his hand!
The next game is up in Boston. The ball gets by Russell and Wilt turns to the basket. I’m the guy coming over to help. I try to punch the ball out of his hand. Instead, I punch him on the broken hand. He looks at me, and he’s going to kill me. And I said to myself, ‘If I play chicken with this guy right now, he’s going to own me.’ So he got to the foul line, and he kept looking at me. He was giving me a stare down. I kept looking him right in the eye. I put my hands on my hips and I just kept staring at him [laughs]. Finally, he said out loud to himself, ‘This guy’s crazy.’ And he took the free throws and I never had another moment of trouble with Wilt [laughs]. It was the ultimate stare-down at the O.K. Corral [laughs].
Someone told me that you played a pretty good prank on Red Auerbach.
I call it my worst day. I was in the insurance business, and I would read mail and the paper with breakfast. I opened the paper and learned that I’d just lost a big, half-million dollar insurance case. I went to my car and drove down to the radio station in Worcester to do my radio show, and when I came out afterwards I had a parking ticket on my windshield. Then I hopped in the car to go to practice, and ended up getting a speeding ticket. I end up late for practice because of the ticket, and I got fined by Red. By this time I’m in a bad mood and I don’t have a particularly good practice. I go downstairs to get dressed afterwards, and when I reach into my pocket I realize that somebody had stolen my wallet. My credit cards are gone, and so is my draft card, which was pretty important in those days. So I’m sitting there very despondent, and Red says, ‘What’s the matter?’ So I tell him about the worst day I’ve ever had, and he says, ‘You know, Tommy, when things aren’t going well, I always like to have a cigar.’ He reaches into his pocket and says, ‘On the way home, here, take this cigar and smoke it. You’ll feel better.’ I said, ‘Red, I’m not a cigar smoker.’ He said, ‘Take it anyway and try it.’ So I’m driving home, and about halfway I say to myself, ‘What a nice gesture on Red’s part to give me the cigar and calm me down a little bit.’ So I unwrap the cigar and I put it in my mouth. I get the cigarette lighter going, I take two puffs, and the damned thing explodes in my face [laughs].
The next day Red says to me, ‘Tommy, did you smoke the cigar?’ Well, I wasn’t going to let him know what happened. I said, ‘No, you know that I don’t smoke cigars. I had to go speak at a thing last night, and I gave it to the monsignor.’ Red said, ‘You gave it to the monsignor?’ And I said, ‘Yes I did.’ Well, he looked at me dumbfounded, but he didn’t say anything.
So, every couple of weeks I’d give him a cigar. I’d say something like, ‘Red, I was just at this thing, and they gave me a couple of cigars. Here. You have them.’ And I’d buy the cigars. I’d feed him the cigars like that, every couple of weeks. The first few, he kept looking at them to see if they were loaded. He’d inspect either end. Finally, I’d given him so many cigars, that he stops looking to see if they’re loaded. Now we’re going into the playoffs. We had practice, and I give him this loaded cigar. All of the newspaper guys are standing around, waiting to hear his pearls of wisdom. He used to sit there, at the bench, and unwrap a cigar, light it up and talk to the press. On this particular occasion he didn’t have a match. I had a cigarette lighter, so I went over and I lit it for him. And he took two puffs, right in front of the press, and it exploded right in his face [laughs]. Let me tell you – he literally chased me out of that place…up the stairs, on the court, everywhere [laughs].
Bill Russell and Sam Jones retired in 1969, and the Celtic Dynasty was officially at an end. What was it like to take over the reins as head coach, and how were you able to temper the fan’s expectations regarding the new starting center, Hank Finkel?
Needless to say, Hank Finkel was no Bill Russell. Here I am, I’m going to take over, and I’m going to try to win a championship without Russell, Mr. Defense, of the last thirteen years. And without Sam Jones, one of the greatest offensive players in the history of the game. I gotta do something with this team. After Cousy retired, the Celtics didn’t run quite as much, and things slowed down toward the end of the dynasty because Russell had reached an advanced age. I always believed that running was the way to win, so I tried to get this team to run a little bit. Really, what the first year was all about, was an elongated tryout camp. Trying to fit the pieces together. Actually, if I’m not mistaken, we didn’t make the playoffs in either of my first two years coaching. But if you look at the team’s record that second year, it was a good enough record to make the playoffs most any other year. We had Finkel, we had Richie Johnson, and we had to devise a way to win. It wasn’t easy. I had to become a coach, have them listen to me, and establish my credentials as a person capable of doing the job. It wasn’t easy, especially when you’re losing and the fans are used to winning championships.
We got through the first year, and then we got Cowens. In the meantime, I had worked with Don Chaney that whole first season, bringing him along. And Jo Jo White was the pick that first season. So I worked with him. The next year I established the style of play, and how to do it. We started in training camp, and we really, really developed an up-tempo game without the likes of a Bob Cousy. And I put together a way of running, so that everybody played a little bit like Bob Cousy. Because I’d run up the floor so many times with him, and I saw how he reacted to the fast break situations. So I devised tactics to do exactly the same thing with different personnel. So we didn’t have to rely on one particular player to deliver the ball, like we did when Cousy was playing. That allowed us to maintain the pace, and win with pace. Because I believed that that’s how the Celtics, when I played, really won. A lot of those games we paced the other team completely out of the game, we’d run so much. But this team I had, with Cowens, was very small. That’s how we had to win games, or not win at all. It succeeded. I put the offense in one year, and then I worked on augmenting it with a pressure defense. The goal was to have a pressure offense and a pressure defense. The pressure offense was to beat them up the floor, make them hustle back, and the pressure defense was to make them work the ball up the floor, and to force them into mistakes. We utilized a lot of people. We changed the morale of the team a little bit, because we used a lot of people, and we started to win.
The following season the Celtics drafted Dave Cowens. How long did it take for you to realize he would be special?
I had never seen him play – Red was the guy that had seen him play. So, when we got him, I had gone down and I’d seen a couple of other centers, and I didn’t like any of them. Red kept telling me about Cowens, who he’d seen at Florida State, and so he said that he was going to draft him. So I said, ‘Fine.’ I didn’t know what the heck he was capable of until I finally go to see him play. And I immediately said, ‘Wow, this guy is a bundle of energy and ferocity.’ So, we used that on the fast break. He really wasn’t a good offensive player at that time. We spent a couple of years working with him on his offense. And we also put in a system to bring him along, to where when we played the big centers like Wilt, Bob Lanier, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Willis Reed, and all of those guys – the big seven-footers – we really had a no-center offense. We would pull Cowens out from under the basket, and we’d rotate people all over the place. So in addition to becoming a rebounder, Cowens also became a playmaker. He had the ball, and he would make Wilt come out, and it was a style that became very, very successful for us. Cowens fit into it beautifully, and it was one of the main reasons we were able to win so many games. We really played two different styles of basketball – against the big teams we ran, and then we’d use this offense if we had to slow down. It forced the opponent’s big guys to come out of the middle and play defense on the outside, on the perimeter, which they didn’t know how to do, nor want to do. Cowens gave us a terrific advantage.
What was it like for you to win your first NBA Championship as head coach of the Boston Celtics?
It ranks right up there with winning my first championship as a player. It was something that I’ll never forget, and it was a great thrill just to be a part of it. The year before, we had won a team-record 68 regular season games, but John Havlicek hurt his shoulder in the playoffs and we got into a 3-1 hole in the Eastern Conference Finals. We tied that series up at 3-3, and then lost that seventh game. So, even though we had a great year, we were left with a very empty feeling to win 68 games and then fall short of a championship.
We came back wiser, healthier, and more mature the next year. We only won 56 games, but we had learned that winning in the playoffs is far more important – you have to win during the regular season, sure, but we wanted to peak at the right time. And that’s what we did. We battled Kareem and Oscar Robertson in that series, and neither team could maintain control of home court advantage. In fact, we were up by a point in Game 6, and had a 3-2 series lead, and all we had to do was make one more stop to win the championship. And then Kareem hits that big shot from the corner. It was one of his patented skyhooks, and it sent the series back to Milwaukee for the seventh game.
We knew we were the better team, and going into that final game we wanted to prove it. We also knew that our pace had taken a toll on Oscar. He was at the end of his career, and all series long he had been forced to hustle on both sides of the ball. He was tired. So we turned up the pressure on him even more. We picked him up earlier on defense. We pushed the ball every chance we got. And we were able to win that game decisively. It was a great thrill, and one of the best basketball experiences that I’ve ever had.
Nineteen years removed from your incredible double-overtime performance against the St. Louis Hawks, your Boston Celtics took the court in Game 5 of the 1976 NBA Finals. In your mind, what stands out most about that triple-overtime thriller?
Fainting in the locker room after it was all over [laughs]. I’d gotten dehydrated during that thing, so they’d brought me into the trainer’s room and I fainted. Somebody asked me a question and I just keeled right over. I ended up with a touch of high blood pressure, and they weren’t going to let me go out to Phoenix and let me coach the next game. It wasn’t until the next day that they changed their minds. They looked me over, and allowed me go out and coach.
That game was such a draining experience. It was a terrific game. We got up big, and then Paul Westphal starting making these whirling-dervish moves. He was the only guy in the league that I’d ever seen go into the paint for a layup, and do a three-sixty at full speed, in the air, and make the shot. And he made about four of those in the second half of that game. And then, of course, Gar Heard hit that big shot. The next game, the sixth game, was in Phoenix. And whoever was able to bend over, tie their sneakers and walk out onto the floor was going to win that game [laughs]. That’s how debilitating that triple-overtime game was back in Boston.
If your athletic career were a play, it would contain three acts: Your sensational collegiate career at Holy Cross, your Hall of Fame career as a player for the Celtics, and your equally impressive job as head coach. If you had to choose a signature Heinsohn moment from each of these acts, what would they be?
At Holy Cross, it was winning the NIT and being named MVP of the Sugar Bowl. As a player, it would be the seventh game of that first championship in 1957. As a coach, it would be wining my first championship against the Bucks in ’74.
Final Question: If you could offer one piece of advice on life to others, what would that be?
I told my kids this – you don’t do things because people will like you. Because I’ve found out playing basketball that forty percent of the people will hate you no matter what. Forty percent of the people will love you no matter what. And twenty percent of the people will actually be influenced by what you truly do. So you’ve got to find something that you like to do, that you have fun doing, and then do it.
https://i0.wp.com/www.fifteenminuteswith.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the_tom_heinsohn_interview2.png?fit=600%2C400&ssl=1400600Michael McClellanhttps://www.fifteenminuteswith.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/FifteenMinutesWith_NewLogoPrototype.pngMichael McClellan2020-11-11 23:15:512020-11-17 22:49:22Tom Heinsohn – Old School
As America began to try and come to terms with the surprising results of the presidential race of 2016, the subsequent rapid-fire speed of events and jam-packed news cycles meant that nobody would ever have the opportunity to truly and properly reflect on what exactly just happened — and how did it?
THE ACCIDENTAL PRESIDENT is British filmmaker/journalist James Fletcher’s quest for those answers. In it, he not only uncovers a detailed play-by-play from all angles on how it all went down, but also the state of America that led to the results, what the electorate was really motivated by, and how a former game show host with an elevated understanding of the media and entertainment was able to connect with others from all walks of life and stage a takeover of Washington D.C. — whether he meant to or not.
Michael D. McClellan sat down with former White House Director of Communications Anthony Scaramucci to discuss Fletcher’s timely documentary, The Accidental President, which will be released in November, 2020. What follows are candid insights from the man who was fired by Trump after 11 days on the job. Links to the socials appear below.
“The Accidental President” – Web and Socials
You briefly served as the White House Director of Communications, so let’s start there. What was it that initially drew you to President Donald Trump? And what happened?
I’ll put it very simply to you, I was a lifelong Republican fundraiser. I interviewed Jeb Bush recently and I yelled at him. I said, “Goddamn it Jeb, if you would have only won the nomination I wouldn’t have gotten anywhere near the White House. So you have this non-traditional candidate who wins, and then he asks me to go work for him. And then [White House advisor] Steve Bannon and [Chief of Staff] Reince Priebus blocked my job. Then my stupidity kicked in because you had my ego involved. Once you put your ego into something, your intelligence is going down and your emotions are going up. So I took the job that the president offered. I got Steve Bannon out of the White House, which I’m convinced is my single greatest accomplishment in American history thus far [laughs]. But there I was, I was a lifelong moderate Republican and a Jeb Bush supporter. I didn’t want to break loyalty from the party, so I got sucked into the Trump orbit. He won, I took the job out of temptation and over-enthusiasm and ego. I made a mistake doing that. I’ve owned that mistake. And then after three years of objectively looking at his presidency, I said, “Okay, if we had voted him in as CEO of our publicly traded company, and we had this magnitude of nastiness that’s going on, we would vote to seek his removal.” In fact, our outside council would come running in and say, “You’ve gotta get rid of the guy.”
The Accidental President does a good job of pointing out that Hillary Clinton may have taken the Rust Belt for granted. Looking back on it now, what is your take?
As I’ve shared with James Fletcher when he was making this documentary, I was moved by the president’s campaign. Even after we’ve had his presidency, and after I’ve evaluated it as objectively as I can and saying that I don’t feel that he’s fit to serve as president, and that we should move on from him, during the campaign I was moved by him and how it was being run. I’m the product of a blue collar environment, and I went on 71 campaign stops with him. Say what you want, feel how you want, but I saw the energy and excitement around him.
The flipside is that Secretary Clinton had spent 30 years in Washington. Rightly or wrongly — and James points this out — she was arguably the most overexposed political candidate in our history. Therefore, people already had an opinion of her. Frankly it turned out to be a polarizing opinion of her, and so many people went out and voted against her more than anything else. And so you had that combination going. So I actually thought that then-candidate Trump had a chance of winning even though the polls were somewhat lopsided.
I’m actually mad at James, because he’s offered an objective, unbiased assessment of what was going on. Of course I wanted him to be biased and knock Trump around a little bit, but he’s a good guy and I think his decisions will serve this documentary very well, both internationally, and as an historic, academic treatment of what went on leading up to the 2016 election. It’s an accurate assessment, and it’s a clear-eyed study from both perspectives. What was great was that James was able to get a whole buffet table of people from different perspectives and ideological ranges, and he did a brilliant job editing it.
President Trump has taken politics and turned it into entertainment.
For a little bit of historical perspective here, I think that John F. Kennedy sort of magnetized the television market for politics. As Richard Nixon said, ruefully, “Oh my god, now we’re stuck with this box called a TV, and we’re going to have to deal with it now.” And then, obviously, President Reagan had a Hollywood element to him. Everything he did was always so well-staged. But I think Donald Trump brought politics into the smash-mouth era, where now you almost have a shock-jock as a political candidate. In some ways Howard Stern is not going to like this comparison, but Donald Trump is the Howard Stern of politicians. He’s out there smashing and breaking all of the totems, so I think that’s where we are now. He’s certainly extended the line of entertainment, and he continues to take it to the edge. Just when you think, “Okay, there’s no way he could go lower, or do something that is even more norm shattering,” he does it. His base loves that, actually. They are entertained because it’s an avatar of anger to the elites that they despise, and to the media that they despise. They feel left out of the system, and they feel disenfranchised, and Mr. Trump represents their avatar, if you will.
Do you think Donald Trump reflects our society today, or do you think he’s the instigator?
James is more objective than me, but I think that even if Mr. Trump exits the stage this coming January, there is a systemic crisis in our country. And the leadership is such that it reflects a swath of the population. So, even if he departs, you still have to deal with the systemic dilemma that we have in this society, where so many people are angry and so many people feel left out.
At what point did you personally feel that you weren’t on the same page with President Trump?
The moment for me was when he went after “The Squad.” These were African-American, Hispanic, and Muslim American women, and he told them to go back to the country they originally came from. That is a racist, nativist trope. My grandmother produced three children, two served in the Second World War, and one of them was my mom. My Uncle Anthony, who I’m named after, got the Purple Heart from our country. He was on the beach at Normandy in 1944. These were American patriots. Should they have gone back to the country that they originally came from? They believed in and love the country more than anybody. So my grandmother was always sore about that. And even though I don’t agree from a policy perspective with those four women known as “The Squad,” they have a right to be here in the country. I would like to debate with them in the intellectual marketplace of ideas, but I don’t need them to go back to the country that they originally came from. So, I said, “That’s racist. That’s American nativism.” And as a result, I’ve disavowed my support. I can’t take any more.
Donald Trump is a master marketer. How can a rich New Yorker connect with so many of the blue collar voters who make up his base?
I don’t want to demonize Mr. Trump. He’s got great communication skills. James does a great job of pointing out how gravitating that sort of smash-mouth talking is to people. But here’s what I would say: He’s using idioms, and you can feel from his ethos that he feels left out. You can feel that he doesn’t have a chip on his shoulder, he has a wedge removed from his shoulder. Therefore, when he’s speaking, a lot of people who feel that way about themselves or their families can identify with it. So, there’s irony to that. He may be a billionaire living on Fifth Avenue in Trump Tower, but he feels left out. So, there is a pathos and an ethos to that, that people who feel the way that he does can identify with.
Last Question: Any regrets when it comes to being fired by Donald Trump?
None whatsoever. If I wasn’t blown from the White House like that, people wouldn’t even know who I am [laughs].
https://i0.wp.com/www.fifteenminuteswith.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the_anthony_scaramucci_interview.png?fit=600%2C400&ssl=1400600Michael McClellanhttps://www.fifteenminuteswith.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/FifteenMinutesWith_NewLogoPrototype.pngMichael McClellan2020-11-02 21:49:562020-11-11 23:18:17Anthony Scaramucci – The Accidental President
If Liliana Tandon’s name has a familiar ring to it, maybe you’re one of the nearly 2 million viewers who’ve watched her comedic web series, Period Piece, the smartly-written, hilarious sendup that explores women in different periods of history…wait for it…having their periods. The award-winning series serves notice that the New York-based actor is not only brimming with talent, but that she also has her finger firmly on the pulse of today’s cultural zeitgeist, an artist so plugged in that her impersonations share the same rarefied air as those of Kate McKinnon and Melissa McCarthy (more on that later). Tandon’s clever parodies, each less than three minutes long and made on a shoestring budget, are the perfect bite-sized morsels for a socially-connected world in which everyone seems to suffer from attention deficit disorder. The episodes mirror their maker – intelligent, irreverent, and downright funny. They’re also rocket fuel for Tandon’s acting career, the trajectory of which already promises great things. As if that weren’t enough, the comedic powerhouse also boasts some serious acting chops: In 2016, she acted opposite Mira Sorvino and LisaGay Hamilton in the crime drama Indiscretion. On November 8, 2020, the Stella Adler grad stars in her first feature film, UPtv’s romantic comedy, A Ring for Christmas. Headlined with such big-name talent as Michael Gross (Family Ties), and the Academy Award-nominated Lorraine Bracco (Goodfellas, The Sopranos), Tandon plays a spoiled rich girl who gets cut off 25 days before Christmas. When her character, Angie Moore, discovers the existence of a sizeable trust fund she will inherit once she gets married, it jumpstarts an ill-fated hubby-search with a feel-good twist.
“My character wants to get married for all of the wrong reasons,” Tandon says with a laugh. “She’s motivated by the trust fund inheritance and not searching for true love, and she’s determined to pull it off before Christmas. It’s what she doesn’t see coming that changes everything.”
Without question, COVID-19 has also changed everything. While the world continues to struggle against the pandemic, Tandon sees A Ring for Christmas as a much-needed escape from the harsh realities of battling this virus.
“I’m very excited about A Ring for Christmas,” Tandon says. “As horrible as this year has been due to coronavirus, I think 2020 is the perfect year for this movie to come out. I think that people are really craving the holidays. People want cheer, joy, and festiveness. They want to be around their families – and even if they can’t, they still want to feel the coziness as if they were. A Ring for Christmas gives them a little bit of that coziness. The holidays can’t come fast enough this year.”
That A Ring for Christmas is even being released qualifies as a minor miracle.
“It was filmed during the 2019 holiday season, so all of the post-production work could still be completed, despite the pandemic,” Tandon says. “Laura Boersma and John Stewart Muller at Granfalloon Productions were simply amazing in that regard. They also introduced us to Michael Lurie, Jeffrey Giles, and Alex Coscas at StoryWorks, who are the producers behind the film. I was lucky, because I was allowed to do some editing with the team in Chicago. I had never been in a studio that size, or with that many big screens. It was really fun to get a peek at all of the post-production stuff, which wouldn’t have been possible if we hadn’t finished filming when we did. Thankfully it all came together. We’re finally able to share this movie with audiences who can certainly use a warm, funny distraction from everything going on right now.”
Tandon is the creative engine behind this holiday gem, and in more ways than one. She not only stars in A Ring for Christmas, she developed the concept and wrote the script.
“The executive team was so generous with me. They knew that I was the writer and the star, and they knew that this project was my little baby. They allowed me to have an unofficial producer role, which is very rare for a writer to have. They were very open to that. They were okay with me having input into the casting. I’m very thankful that they allowed me to have a seat at the table.”
Liliana Tandon’s love of acting goes back to her childhood, sparked during an eight-week summer camp at Brown Ledge in Vermont. Brown Ledge isn’t exclusively a theatre camp, but theatre is a big part of the program. At the time, she could have cared less. A 10-year-old Liliana Tandon was far more interested in horseback riding than learning lines.
“I was obsessed with horses at the time, but my oldest sister, Xandra, auditioned for a play. Being the youngest child of three, I said, ‘I want to do that. I want to copy my sister.’ So I auditioned for a play and discovered how much I loved it.”
To say the acting bug bit Tandon harder than the mosquitos on Lake Champlain would be an understatement. She fell in love with the stage, opening up a world full of new and exciting possibilities.
“The theatre department at Brown Ledge was unbelievable,” she says. “The camp was eight weeks long, and during that time we would do three one-act plays a week. You would get cast on Sunday, and then you would perform on Saturday night. Not only were we doing a short play every week, we were given two weeks to put together a full-length play, and two weeks to do a musical.”
A young Liliana Tandon was struck by the discipline and focus needed to pull off so much in so little time, attributes that serve her well today.
“Talk about an amazing learning experience,” Tandon continues. “That camp taught us how to build character and learn lines really fast. We were also involved in all aspects of the productions as campers, so it was truly a unique experience. During the day we got to help build the sets, and then we rehearsed during the afternoon and evening time. It was a great place to get my start in acting.”
Now, about Period Piece.
Liliana Tandon’s whip-smart web series has not only garnered plenty of attention – the first season had over one million views on YouTube, and was featured in Cosmopolitan, Seventeen, Women’s Health, Marie Claire France, and India Today – it has also been a critical success, winning Best Original Web Series in Elizabeth Banks’ 2016 WhoHaHa Female Comedy Awards. The episodes are funny from the jump, binge-worthy skits that not only pack a punch, but also aim to destigmatize menstruation in the media as well as empower women to embrace their periods. Whether the “period” is Victorian England or 1920’s Brooklyn, you can rest assured that the comedy is, pardon the pun, bloody funny.
“I was sitting on my friend Rachel Kent’s couch,” Tandon says, when asked about the moment that led to the series becoming reality. “She actually has a role in A Ring for Christmas. The two of us were sitting there, drinking wine, and just started laughing about the pun, ‘period piece.’ We were like, ‘That’s just funny when you think about it in those terms.’ We joked about writing a show about it, and then I woke up the next day and said, ‘Actually, I think that that’s a really good idea.’ This was right before the Me Too movement, and women were at the forefront of a lot of the social conversation. It was the perfect time to run with the idea.”
Tandon’s web series is especially brave considering the subject matter: Do it right, and you have an iconic moment on par with Melissa McCarthy’s Brides Maids character Megan, who memorably has diarrhea in a sink (not many Oscar-nominated performances can claim that); mishandle it, and you’re left picking up the pieces. Tandon not only nailed it, she partnered with Racket, a charity that provides free feminine hygiene products to women in need.
“It was so fun to write, and even better that we could help destigmatize something that every girl should be comfortable talking about, laughing at, and owning,” Tandon says. “Each episode is its own historical time period. I had to do my research. I took facts that I learned, as well as myths surrounding menstruation at time, and then exaggerated everything for comedic effect.”
Which brings us back to Kate McKinnon and Melissa McCarthy.
Period Piece was not only a 2016 Official Selection by both the Bushwick Film Festival and ITV Fest, it showed up and showed out in Banks’ female-driven comedy awards event: Two episodes were WhoHaHa finalists for Favorite Parody (against an Amy Schumer sketch), with Tandon herself a finalist for Best Impersonation for her impression of Donald Trump – against fellow finalists McCarthy and McKinnon.
“The Trump episode, I wrote that before the 2016 election, before he became president,” Tandon says. “We just thought that it would be fun to do something that was in the news today. At first I was looking for a man to play Trump, and I was going to play the Megyn Kelly character in the sketch. I had some great options, but my friend wanted to know why I wasn’t playing Trump. So, I thought, ‘Okay, this could be kind of fun.’ And it would definitely raise the ridiculousness of it.
“It was a very proud moment when Period Piece won for Best Original Web Series. And just having my impersonation going up against Melissa McCarthy and Kate McKinnon, who were nominated for the impressions that they were doing for Saturday Night Live at the time, was a pinch-me moment. I didn’t win – I think Melissa McCarthy won – but just being nominated with them was a thrill.”
A Ring for Christmas promises to keep Liliana Tandon on everyone’s wish list. That the Indian-American actor brings intelligence, humor, and beauty to the screen is certain to endear her to audiences everywhere, as well as for Christmases to come. That she gets to do so under the direction of highly-regarded industry veteran Don E. FauntLeRoy, best known for Jeepers Creepers and several Steven Seagal films, only makes it better.
“Don was very kind, and very generous with me. He sat down with me before we shot, and we went through the whole script. Since I was also the writer, he wanted to know if there was anything he should know when it came to picturing these characters, or how I imagined certain scenes would go. That way he could make sure that he was upholding my vision for this film.
“He and his wife have both been in the industry for a very long time. With me being the less-experienced person on the set, I expected them to come in and say, ‘Great, thank you, we’ve got this.’ But Don was so considerate. It taught me that a film is a collaborative effort. The best approach is to start from a place of ego-free collaboration. From there you can come together and talk about the movie and figure it out. The fact that Don has so many amazing credits, it was very generous of him to allow me to be involved in that way.
In addition to a quality director, the cast also packs plenty of star power.
Bracco has been nominated for an Academy Award, four Emmy Awards, four Golden Globe Awards, and three Screen Actors Guild Awards during her illustrious career. Gross, who graduated with an MFA from Yale, has performed steadily since 1975. He was white hot during the 1980s, playing opposite Michael J. Fox and Meredith Baxter-Birney in the hit TV series, Family Ties.
“It was such an honor to work with them both,” Tandon says quickly. “With Lorraine, I hope that people enjoy watching her, because it is very, very different from what she normally does. People know her from Goodfellas and the Sopranos, so they know her as this very tough woman. The way the part is written and the way she plays it, you still see that great toughness, which I think is perfect for this character. But it is a different type of role for her, so it was exciting to see her work.”
Tandon couldn’t have been happier with Bracco’s ‘whatever-it-takes’ attitude.
“Lorraine really helped establish that this was a team effort, and that she was a part of the team. We filmed in Newburyport, Massachusetts, in 2019. One day it was 12 degrees outside, before wind chill. When you’re the lone Academy Award nominee on the set, it would have been very easy for her to say, ‘Great, call me right before you say ‘action,’ and I’ll come out and say my lines and then go right back in where it’s warm. But she was out there, with the crew, setting such a good example for everybody, and creating such an all for one, and one for all vibe. I just love that about her. She was just such a trooper. Her work ethic is incredible.”
Tandon was equally impressed with Gross, who plays Margaret Moore’s husband, Graham.
“He is just as nice as you might imagine,” she says, smiling. “Like Lorraine, he was a great part of the team. The scenes that we had together were special because he was right there with me, giving me so much to work with. I felt so incredibly lucky.
“There’s story about Michael Gross that always warms my heart. After we finished our scenes together, he asked me if we could get a picture together. It made me feel so great, because I didn’t have to ask him, he beat me to the punch. It made me feel that he was genuinely happy and excited to be there. He understood that I might be a little nervous asking for the picture, so he took it upon himself to take that burden off of me. I’m sure he could tell that I wanted one [laughs].”
A Ring for Christmas also stars South African hunk Dean Geyer as Gabe Hudson. Geyer, best-known for his role as Brody Weston on Glee, and for his strong martial arts background, is perfectly cast as Angie Moore’s love interest.
“Dean was really great to work with,” Tandon says. “He came out a couple of days early, so that we could have a chance to meet each other, and try to bond a little bit. Obviously, when you’re playing romantic opposites in a film, it’s always nice to develop a comfort level before the big kiss scene. You have to get to know people a little bit. So it was nice of him to come out early. He and Charles Hittinger, who plays Tyler Davis in the film, have something of a love triangle with me in the film. It was a lot of fun on the set, especially whenever they got together.”
With her magnetic screen presence, it’s easy to overlook the fact that A Ring for Christmas is Liliana Tandon’s screenplay. The multihyphenate is multitalented, and nowhere is that better illustrated than in the script. Tandon, a superb writer, took her time crafting this fun holiday romp. She also made a conscious decision not to overthink the process. The result is a feel-good movie with great character acting and a wonderful, well-paced storyline.
“For me, it was about finding something that I’d enjoy for my first film,” she says. “I didn’t want it to be too complicated to write. With these types of movies, they are similar in that they have the same kinds of arcs built into them. Then I started brainstorming, and I thought it would be funny watching a girl rushing to get married before Christmas. I couldn’t believe that there wasn’t already a Christmas movie called, A Ring for Christmas. I jumped on it.”
The fact that Tandon reached out to others for help also shows great instincts.
“I started writing it, and it took me somewhere between nine months and a year to complete. Laura Boersma at Granfalloon has been a mentor of mine for years. I’d worked for her as a production assistant, and then as an actress, and now for the first time as the creative force behind a project. She’s the one who introduced us to StoryWorks – Jeffrey, Michael, and Alex – and they’ve made a ton of these, so this genre is really their bread and butter. Laura knew that we’d be in great hands with them, and that they would know what to do. It truly does take a village to put something like this together. I’m excited for audiences to see it.”
As winter sets in and the holiday season arrives, Liliana Tandon’s career is just heating up. A graduate of New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts, Tandon is excited about A Ring for Christmas and equally enthusiastic about what the future holds. She also has a passion for cooking, which should come in handy when (socially) gathered with her fiancée, Jon, to celebrate film’s premiere on UPtv on November 8.
“I love the communal, familial aspect of cooking,” Tandon says. “Hosting dinner parties and having friends over, because those are the ways you make memories. To be able to prepare a meal and watch this film will be a fun way to spend an evening.”
Liliana Tandon is a baller.
Whether she’s being nominated with the likes of Kate McKinnon and Melissa McCarthy, scoring millions of YouTube visits, or acting opposite Mira Sorvino and LisaGay Hamilton, it’s clear that Tandon has both the ambition and the intellect to make a name for herself in Hollywood. That the Stella Adler grad is on the ready to share her secret sauce – her acting joie de vivre – with other creatives, well, that makes it all the better. “My biggest piece of advice would be this,” Tandon says. “If you’re feeling stuck or overwhelmed by this industry, I would say to lean into whatever it is that’s in your way. If you say, ‘I wish I could create something but I’m not a writer,’ I would say, ‘Just try it.’ I wasn’t a writer. I didn’t go to school for writing. That wasn’t something that I was traditionally trained in. There are books you can read, you might have friends you can talk to, and the Internet is practically a limitless source of information. Definitely utilize all of those, but I strongly suggest just jumping in and trying. I’m living proof. There’s nothing like the feeling of saying, ‘Wow I had control of this from the start to the finish. I got to make this film, A Ring for Christmas, and it wouldn’t have been possible if I hadn’t jumped in with both feet.’ The same thing is true with acting. Do short films. Cast yourself. I did exactly that with Period Piece, and it worked about great for me. You never know where the risks will lead, but you will never know if you don’t try.”
https://i0.wp.com/www.fifteenminuteswith.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/the_liliana_tandon_interview2.png?fit=600%2C400&ssl=1400600Michael McClellanhttps://www.fifteenminuteswith.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/FifteenMinutesWith_NewLogoPrototype.pngMichael McClellan2020-11-01 22:18:482020-11-03 19:04:43Liliana Tandon – A Ring for Christmas